Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1836Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lưu Quý Khương | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Trịnh Thị Nhung | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-19T04:39:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-19T04:39:58Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1836 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Based on the theoretical background of pragmatics and cross-cultural pragmatics, this study investigates similarities and differences in criticizing university students in English classes by English Native Speakers Teachers (ENSTs) and Vietnamese Teachers of English (VTsE) in terms of politeness strategy. The data of the study is collected via two kinds of questionnaire. The first is Metapragmatic questionnaire (MPQ) which tests the validity and the reliability of the manner of complimenting in 12 typical situations. The second is Discourse Completion Task questionnaire (DCT) which collects linguistic input. Besides, some parameters of informants such as age, gender, nationality, teaching experience are also taken into consideration so that the two aspects of the politeness dimension above are thoroughly investigated. The findings of the study are cross- cultural compared and contrasted so as to specify major similarities and differences in the ways ENSTs and VTsE criticize university students. The author hopes that the study, to a certain extent, helps cross-cultural interactants communicate effectively and avoid cultural shock or communication breakdown. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP ................................................................... i ABSTRACT......................................................................................................ii TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS........................................................................... v LIST OF TABLE ............................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIRGURE ........................................................................................ vii CHATER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1. RATIONALE............................................................................................. 1 1.2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................... 3 1.2.1. AIMS............................................................................................. 3 1.2.2. OBJECTIVES............................................................................... 4 1.3. RESEARCH QUESTIONS........................................................................ 4 1.4. SCOPE OF THE STUDY.......................................................................... 4 1.5. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY........................................................... 5 1.6. ORGANIZATION OF THE STUDY........................................................ 5 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. PREVIOUS RESEARCHES RELATED TO THE TOPIC ...................... 7 2.2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND......................................................... 10 2.2.1. CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION............................. 10 2.2.2. PRAGMATICS AND CROSS-CULTURAL PRAGMATICS . 12 2.2.3. THEORY OF POLITENESS ..................................................... 13 2.2.4. POLITENESS ACROSS CULTURES ...................................... 19 2.2.5. DIRECTNESS AND INDIRECTNESS..................................... 19 2.2.6. THEORY OF SPEECH ACTS................................................... 21 iv CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 3.1. RESEARCH METHODS ........................................................................ 30 3.2. DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS ............................................... 30 3.3. SAMPLING ............................................................................................. 31 3.4. PROCEDURE OF DATA COLLECTION ............................................. 32 3.5. PROCEDURE OF DATA ANALYSIS................................................... 35 CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.1. REALIZATION OF STRATEGIES IN CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS .................................................................................................... 36 4.1.1. DIRECT CRITICISMS .............................................................. 36 4.1.2. INDIRECT CRITICISMS .......................................................... 43 4.2. USE OF DIRECT STRATEGIES OR INDIRECT STRATEGIES AS SEEN FROM COMMUNICATING PARTNERS......................................... 50 4.2.1. CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS BY VTSE............ 50 4.2.2. CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS BY ENSTS.......... 59 4.3. CROSS-CULTURAL SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES.............. 65 4.3.1. DIFFERENCES.......................................................................... 66 4.3.2. SIMILARITIES .......................................................................... 69 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION 5.1. A SUMMARY OF THE STUDY............................................................ 71 5.2. PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY........................... 72 5.3. LIMITATION .......................................................................................... 72 5.4. SUGGESTION FOR THE STUDY......................................................... 73 REFERENCES.............................................................................................. 74 QUYẾT ĐỊNH GIAO ĐỀ TÀI (bản sao | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng | en_US |
| dc.title | A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | LV ThS 418 | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Ngôn ngữ Anh | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUAN VAN NHUNG.pdf Restricted Access | 473.95 kB | Adobe PDF |  Sign in to read | |
| TOM TAT.pdf Restricted Access | 208.88 kB | Adobe PDF | Sign in to read |
Due to copyright, some materials are displayed in bibliographic records or for archives only. Using materials in the Digital Library must comply with the Intellectual Property Law.