DSpace

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1836
Title: A CROSS- CULTURAL STUDY OF CRITICIZING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ENGLISH CLASSES IN VIETNAM BY ENGLISH NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS AND VIETNAMESE TEACHERS OF ENGLISH
Other Titles: LV ThS 418
Authors: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lưu Quý Khương
Trịnh Thị Nhung
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Đà Nẵng
Abstract: Based on the theoretical background of pragmatics and cross-cultural pragmatics, this study investigates similarities and differences in criticizing university students in English classes by English Native Speakers Teachers (ENSTs) and Vietnamese Teachers of English (VTsE) in terms of politeness strategy. The data of the study is collected via two kinds of questionnaire. The first is Metapragmatic questionnaire (MPQ) which tests the validity and the reliability of the manner of complimenting in 12 typical situations. The second is Discourse Completion Task questionnaire (DCT) which collects linguistic input. Besides, some parameters of informants such as age, gender, nationality, teaching experience are also taken into consideration so that the two aspects of the politeness dimension above are thoroughly investigated. The findings of the study are cross- cultural compared and contrasted so as to specify major similarities and differences in the ways ENSTs and VTsE criticize university students. The author hopes that the study, to a certain extent, helps cross-cultural interactants communicate effectively and avoid cultural shock or communication breakdown.
URI: https://data.ufl.udn.vn/handle/UFL/1836
Appears in Collections:Ngôn ngữ Anh

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LUAN VAN NHUNG.pdf
  Restricted Access
473.95 kBAdobe PDFbook.png
 Sign in to read
TOM TAT.pdf
  Restricted Access
208.88 kBAdobe PDFbook.png
 Sign in to read


Due to copyright, some materials are displayed in bibliographic records or for archives only. Using materials in the Digital Library must comply with the Intellectual Property Law.